This paper considers causal inference and sample selection bias in nonexperimental settings in which. Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal. This article focuses on common methods for matching. Also, there are few methods addressing the hidden bias in causal survival analysis. The validity of inference will then strictly depend on the plausibility of the assumptions underlying the employed statistical techniques. The most common implementation of propensityscore matching is 1. However, when a study s sample size is not large, a. Propensity scorematching methods for nonexperimental.
Propensity scorebased methods for causal inference in. In other words, regardless of the exact technique used to adjust for the. Propensity score methods are increasingly being used to address this bias. The central role of the propensity score in observational. Why does propensity score matching work for causal inference.
Testing causal effects in observational survival data. Matching methods such as nearest neighbor propensity score matching are increasingly popular techniques for controlling confounding in nonexperimental studies. Propensityscore matching is used frequently in the medical literature 57. An application of kernelbased versus onetoone propensity score matching for a nonexperimental causal study. Dehejia and sadek wahba this article uses propensity score methods to estimate the treatment impact of the national supported work nsw demonstration, a labor training program, on postintervention earnings. Propensity score methods for causal inference with the. Combining groupbased trajectory modeling and propensity. Affinely invariant matching methods, such as propensity score or. Propensity scores ps are an increasingly popular method to adjust for confounding in observational studies. The essential role of balance tests in propensitymatched observational studies. In this project, we develop matching methods that can help empirical researchers conduct reliable and efficient causal inference in both experimental and observational studies. Ex post facto research nonexperimental designs that are used to investigate causal relationships they examine whether one or more preexisting conditions could possibly have caused subsequent differences in groups of subjects researchers attempt to discover whether differences between groups have. Probability of receiving the treatment given the observed covariates.
As compared to multivariate matching, propensity score matching eliminates the problem of finding an area of common support for all covariates. Thus, you could infer that attending a catholic high school has an average causal treatment effect of 3. Propensityscore methodsfor causalinferencewith the psmatch. After propensity score adjustment, the distribution of baseline covariates will be balanced between treated and. Dehejia and sadek wahba abstractthis paper considers causal inference and sample selection bias in nonexperimental settings in which i few units in the nonexperimental comparison group are comparable to the treatment units, and ii selecting. Propensity score matching in observational studies author. Using the propensity score the authors 2012 method to.
Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical. This research aimed to estimate the effect of teaching management and planning on increasing academic planning behavior apb, using propensity score matching psm. Estimatingcausal effectsfrom observationaldata withthe. Rubin m any studies in social science that aim to estimate the effect of an intervention suffer from treatment selection bias, where the units who receive the treatment may have different characteristics from those in the control. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. We first provide an introduction to the goal of matching and the history of these methods section 1. The authors have written an important book, one that is accessible to students and provocatively argued. Following lalonde 1986, we pair the experimental treated units with nonexperimental comparison units from the cps and psid, and compare the estimates of the treatment effect obtained using our methods to the benchmark results from. Propensity scorebased methods for causal inference in observational studies with nonbinary treatments shandong zhao1, david a van dyk2 and kosuke imai3 abstract propensity score methods are a part of the standard toolkit for applied researchers who wish to ascertain causal effects from observational data. In nonexperimental studies, one often collects data on many potential oonfoun ders. Applyingthe ps thereare in generalthreedifferent methods. Can do subsequent regression adjustment to eliminate residual imbalance in prognostically important covariates after. The effect of treatment may be estimated by directly comparing outcomes between treated and untreated subjects in the matched. Dehejia department of economics columbia university 420 w.
Nov 11, 2014 hua he, jun hu and jiang he, overview of propensity score methods, statistical causal inferences and their applications in public health research, 10. Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The item propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in university of manitoba libraries. As starr et a note, one then hew the dilemma that both. Comparison of propensity score methods and covariate. In fact, precisely because nonexperimental studies do not have the bene. A key assumption in nonexperimental studies is that of strongly ignorable. All four propensity score techniques weighting, nearest neighbor matching, optimal matching, and subclassification produced nearly identical estimates, all providing no evidence for a causal effect range of estimate. Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies article in ssrn electronic journal january 2002 with 102 reads how we measure reads. We discuss the use of propensity scorematching methods, and implement them using data from the national supported work experiment.
Application of propensity score models in observational studies nikki carroll, kaiser permanente colorado. One example of a causal inference that researchers might try to determine is whether a specific management practice, such as group training or a stock option plan, increases organizational performance. Nearest neighbor oneone or manyone matching, radius matching, kernel matching, mahalanobis metric matching, matching with a genetic algorithm. View dehejia2002 from stat 6022 at university of cincinnati. Causal case study methods university of michigan press. Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting. Propensity score matching developed as part of rubin causal model wikipedia contributors 2016. Outline estimating causal e ects society for prevention. We propose the use of propensity score matching methods, and implement them using data from the nsw experiment. Heckman 1997 also played a role in the development of propensity score matching methods. Cross validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Iacusy gary kingz giuseppe porrox november 22, 2015 abstract to reduce model dependence and bias in causal inference, researchers usually use.
Intuitively,thisassumesthat,conditioningonobservable covariates,wecantakeassignmenttotreatmenttohavebeen randomandthat,inparticular,unobservablesplaynorolein. We propose a strategy to test for survival function differences based on the matching design and explore sensitivity of the p. The propensity score is a common tool for estimating the causal e. Nonexperimental causal studies with incomplete matching and. National bureau of economic research, 1998 ocolc891671763. Following lalonde 1986, we pair the experimental treated units with nonexperimental comparison units from the cps and psid, and compare the estimates of the treatment effect obtained using our methods to the. Propensity score methods for causal inference with the psmatch procedure yang yuan, yiufai yung, and maura stokes, sas institute inc. Dehejia and sadek wahba abstractthis paper considers.
This course will cover some of the most popular techniques for estimating causal effects with observational data. Propensity score matching can be conducted using a variety of statistical packages. In many academic settings teaching a particular topic is applied to every student enrolled in the same academic year, it is a difficult task for researchers to design a randomized control group study. The reader is referred to gu and rosenbaum for an indepth comparison of different matching methods. This paper applies propensity score methods, which have been developed in the statistics literature, to lalondes dataset. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design. Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs rajeev h. Comments on a critical appraisal of propensityscore matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 by peter austin. Criticized by lalonde, defended by dehejia and wahba and critisized again by king and nielsen. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing. This is all the more troubling because, although these theories require exact matching, most matching applications resort to some form of ex post strati. Application of propensity score models in observational.
When estimating causal effects using observational data, it is desirable to replicate a randomized experiment as closely as possible by obtaining treated and control groups with similar covariate distributions. People attempt to draw causal inferences using many different statistical techniques e. We discuss the use of propensity score matching methods, and implement them using data from the national supported work experiment. One great way to learn about the strengths and weaknesses of different statistical techniques for causal inference is to compare them on the same data. Estimation of causal effects using propensity score. Application of propensity score models in observational studies. T1 using full matching to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental studies. In contrast with lalondes findings, using propensity score methods, we are able closely to replicate the experimental training effect. Eric ej788243 using full matching to estimate causal.
Section 2 presents the theory and motivation behind propensity scores, discussing how they are a crucial tool in the use of matching methods. Matching methods have a few key advantages over those other approaches. Using the propensity score method to estimate causal. Propensity score matching is used for make causal inferences in observational studies.
What are the best empirical studies comparing causal. Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded these. T2 examining the relationship between adolescent marijuana use and adult outcomes. Ps methods allow for estimation of the marginal treatment eect. Propensity scorematching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Figure 1shows that the average math score for students who attend public schools is 3. A theory of statistical inference for matching methods in.
The estimation of causal effects is a central goal of social science research. Propensity score matching psm is the most widely used matching technique for nonexperimental causal studies dehejia and wahba 2002. Pdf propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental. Methods for causal inference with observational data. Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments. Presentation in the international methods colloquium. Even in the absence of confounding by unmeaswd risk factors, the resulting data will be weak data usbss the ample size is very large or matching was done on most of the confounders. Dehejiaand sadek wahba this article uses propensity score methods to estimate the treatment impact of the national supported work nsw demonstration, a labor training program, on postintervention earnings.
Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Motivation for propensity score weighting propensity score methods are used to remove the effects of observable confounders when estimating the effect of a treatment on an outcome have been discussing matching methods stratification, nearest neighbor, etc. In observational studies, the true propensity score is not, in general, known. Previous versions of this paper were circulated under the title an oversampling algorithm for. Causalcomparative studies involve comparison, whereas correlational studies involve relationship. Interested readers can consult guo and fraser 2010 and references cited therein for more information regarding variations of matching algorithms, sensitivity analyses, and other issues related to psm. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the. He focused on selection bias, with a primary emphasis on making casual inferences when there is non random assignment.
Alternatives to matching methods include adjusting for background variables in a regression model, instrumental variables, structural equation modeling, or selection models. An application to data on right heart catheterization keisuke hirano department of economics, university of miami, po box 248126, coral gables, fl 331246550 email. Propensity scores and causal inference learning methods. Research on matching methods for causal inference in. Dehejia and sadek wahba abstract this paper considers causalinference and sample selection bias in nonexperimental settings in which i few units in the nonexperimental comparison group are comparable to the treatment units, and ii selecting. Propensity scores can also be used to weight observations like a sample. Causal case study methods is an insightful volume that brings together a comprehensive survey of the epistemological and ontological foundations of casestudy methods with a set of guidelines for the design and execution of these studies. Methods to conduct propensity score matching using sas are described in chapter 3 of faries, leon, maria haro, and obenchain 2010.
Abstract in a randomized study, subjects are randomly assigned to either a treated group or a control group. Onetoone nearest neighbor and caliper matching without replacement. Propensity scorematching methods for nonexperimental causal. Summary and discussion of \the central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal e ects statistics journal club, 36825 jessica chemali and michael vespe 1 summary 1. They lay out the assumptions needed for causal inference and describe the leading analysis methods, including matching, propensityscore methods, and instrumental variables. Causalcomparative studies attempt to establish causeeffect relationships. The why, when, and how of propensity score methods for estimating causal e. Using the propensity score method to estimate causal effects.
Propensity score methods have theoretical advantages over conventional covariate adjustment, but their relative performance in realword scenarios is poorly characterized. Application of propensity score models in observational studies nikki carroll, kaiser permanente colorado abstract treatment effects from observational studies may be biased as patients are not randomly allocated to a treatment group. Propensity score matching psm has become a popular approach to es. The authors discuss how randomized experiments allow us to assess causal effects and then turn to observational studies. We used datasets from 4 largescale cardiovascular observational studies prometheus, adaptdes. Scorea age schoolblackhispanic no degreemarriedre74re75 u74 u75 treatment effect means regression treatment effect nsw 185 0. Propensity scorematching methods for nonexperimental causal studies rajeev h. Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental. A theory of statistical inference for matching methods in applied causal research stefano m.
A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Jun 08, 2011 the reader is referred to gu and rosenbaum for an indepth comparison of different matching methods. Labor studies this paper considers causal inference and sample selection bias in nonexperimental settings in which. Propensity score matching is employed to create a control group that is comparable to the treated group with respect to the observed covariates.
647 987 447 74 1485 1205 1010 1402 1294 1374 809 560 490 1170 149 836 686 557 1597 1474 855 764 921 1330 1323 1425 1528 1616 1189 881 210 1381 307 44 864 564 857